Crowthorne Wood – Up for Sale
By Maggie_V | Monday, January 24, 2011, 11:08
Yesterday morning I read about the Government proposal to
-
For Sale - Crowthorne Wood
-
Save Our Forests
-
Help Save Crowthorne Wood
sell off state owned Forestry Commission land and later found myself walking the
dog in Crowthorne Wood and realised that it was one of the woods affected by
the proposed sale. After some research
on the internet, I discovered a map on the 38 degrees website showing all the
woods affected. The two forests nearest
to Camberley affected by the proposals are Crowthorne and Bramshill Forests.
My personal feelings are that we should not sell off the forests;
once they are gone they will be lost to future generations. What do you think? There are at least two petitions collecting
signatures – The Woodland Trust and 38 Degrees “Save Our Forests” Campaign –
and there may well be more.
Crowthorne Wood (along with Bramshill) has been restored by
the Forestry Commission over the last decade into a wildlife haven – exemplary
Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
The Forestry Commission site describes the area as one that “combines
forest, water areas and heath” and is “rich in dragonflies, butterflies and
rare birds and plants, all amidst breathtaking scenery.” According to the British Dragonfly Society it
is one of the best sites in England,
with at least 24 species of dragonfly and damselfly breeding there, out of 38
listed in the entire country. It is also
an important Special Protection Area because three rare European birds breed
there – the Dartford Warbler, woodlark and nightjar. The area is also home to a community of rare
insects that love bare earth such as burrowing bees and wasps. There are also a variety of amphibians and
reptiles, including grass snakes and adders, and a number of threatened plant
species, such as pillwort, a rare aquatic fern.
The woods, reputed to have once been part of King Henry
VIII’s hunting forests, were farm and parkland until conifers were planted
there in the 1920’s to provide timber.
By the last 1960’s the need for building materials meant that many
fields were dug for gravel and sand.
Restoration was needed after sand and gravel quarries were exhausted and
then land filled or left to fill with water.
There was stagnant water and the heath had been neglected. Nick Hazlitt, a forester from the Forestry
Commission, said that “without this project the site would have ended up with
uncontrolled scrub, trees and vegetation with shaded and stagnant water, an
environment which would not have attracted the current quality of wildlife.” Last
January it was announced that thousands of trees were to be planted as part of
a nature conservation project in Crowthorne Wood by the Forestry Commission.
The Forestry Commission manages nearly 1,300 hectares of
land in the Thames
Basin, including
Bramshill and Crowthorne Wood. The wood
that is harvested sustainably from the forests provides income to support
conservation and recreation. In total
the Forestry Commission looks after over 250,000 hectares (600, 000 acres) or
woodlands in England
and most of this land is open for public access. The Forestry Commission is the government
department responsible “for protecting, expanding and promoting the sustainable
management of woods and forests and increasing their value to society and the
environment” – that is until the government of the day decides to sell it off
to the highest bidder and then the words sound cynically hollow!!
Comments
Hi Sue, Thank you for your comment - it makes me feel that the legislation that is put forward in this country is ill thought out sometimes. Have just been listening to You and Yours on Radio Four about the proposed sell off of some of the woodland and I am still not convinced that it is the right thing to do. I do however take your point about the National Parks Authorities.
By Maggie_V at 13:04 on 25/01/11
ReportPlease think very carefully of the repercussions you may inflict upon hundreds of thousands of National Park/Broads residents by demanding the Public Bodies Bill is scrapped as a whole.
In the New Forest, we are currently undergoing a Defra public consultation on the governance arrangements of English national parks/Broads authorities. Members of National Park Authorities (NPA) are unelected and unaccountable, staying in post for up to 10 years. The general public would not accept their local authority councillors to serve that length of time without the need for re-elections – so why should NP residents be treated as second-class citizens? The ONE VOICE current online survey shows that 86% of NP residents want to see direct elections of authority members. There is currently no statutory mechanism in place that could redress this democratic deficit. For this reason we would support the Public Bodies Bill as it will create a mechanism to change the constitution of National Park Authorities and bring them in line with other local authorities.
The New Forest has the second largest area of FC land, totalling 27,613 hectares and we all have a stake in its future. Those calling for the Public Bodies Bill to be scrapped before it reaches Royal Ascent are acting because they are passionate about retaining public access to woodlands and forests, and that is a good thing. We only ask that you reconsider the need to scrap the Bill ‘wholesale’ and consider the implications for the folk who need legislation to improve local democracy. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
Sue Baillie, ONE VOICE, New Forest http://tinyurl.com/64rgzfq
By OneVoiceHants at 22:39 on 24/01/11
Report