Crowthorne Wood – Up for Sale

Profile image for Maggie_V

By Maggie_V | Monday, January 24, 2011, 11:08

Yesterday morning I read about the Government proposal to

sell off state owned Forestry Commission land and later found myself walking the

dog in Crowthorne Wood and realised that it was one of the woods affected by

the proposed sale.  After some research

on the internet, I discovered a map on the 38 degrees website showing all the

woods affected.  The two forests nearest

to Camberley affected by the proposals are Crowthorne and Bramshill Forests.

My personal feelings are that we should not sell off the forests;

once they are gone they will be lost to future generations.  What do you think?  There are at least two petitions collecting

signatures – The Woodland Trust and 38 Degrees “Save Our Forests” Campaign

and there may well be more.

Crowthorne Wood (along with Bramshill) has been restored by

the Forestry Commission over the last decade into a wildlife haven – exemplary

Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). 

The Forestry Commission site describes the area as one that “combines

forest, water areas and heath” and is “rich in dragonflies, butterflies and

rare birds and plants, all amidst breathtaking scenery.”  According to the British Dragonfly Society it

is one of the best sites in England,

with at least 24 species of dragonfly and damselfly breeding there, out of 38

listed in the entire country.  It is also

an important Special Protection Area because three rare European birds breed

there – the Dartford Warbler, woodlark and nightjar.  The area is also home to a community of rare

insects that love bare earth such as burrowing bees and wasps.  There are also a variety of amphibians and

reptiles, including grass snakes and adders, and a number of threatened plant

species, such as pillwort, a rare aquatic fern.

The woods, reputed to have once been part of King Henry

VIII’s hunting forests, were farm and parkland until conifers were planted

there in the 1920’s to provide timber. 

By the last 1960’s the need for building materials meant that many

fields were dug for gravel and sand. 

Restoration was needed after sand and gravel quarries were exhausted and

then land filled or left to fill with water. 

There was stagnant water and the heath had been neglected.  Nick Hazlitt, a forester from the Forestry

Commission, said that “without this project the site would have ended up with

uncontrolled scrub, trees and vegetation with shaded and stagnant water, an

environment which would not have attracted the current quality of wildlife.”  Last

January it was announced that thousands of trees were to be planted as part of

a nature conservation project in Crowthorne Wood by the Forestry Commission.

The Forestry Commission manages nearly 1,300 hectares of

land in the Thames

Basin, including

Bramshill and Crowthorne Wood.  The wood

that is harvested sustainably from the forests provides income to support

conservation and recreation.  In total

the Forestry Commission looks after over 250,000 hectares (600, 000 acres) or

woodlands in England

and most of this land is open for public access.  The Forestry Commission is the government

department responsible “for protecting, expanding and promoting the sustainable

management of woods and forests and increasing their value to society and the

environment” – that is until the government of the day decides to sell it off

to the highest bidder and then the words sound cynically hollow!! 

Picture Gallery

      

Comments

       
  • Profile image for Maggie_V

    Hi Sue, Thank you for your comment - it makes me feel that the legislation that is put forward in this country is ill thought out sometimes. Have just been listening to You and Yours on Radio Four about the proposed sell off of some of the woodland and I am still not convinced that it is the right thing to do. I do however take your point about the National Parks Authorities.

    By Maggie_V at 13:04 on 25/01/11

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for OneVoiceHants

    Please think very carefully of the repercussions you may inflict upon hundreds of thousands of National Park/Broads residents by demanding the Public Bodies Bill is scrapped as a whole.
    In the New Forest, we are currently undergoing a Defra public consultation on the governance arrangements of English national parks/Broads authorities. Members of National Park Authorities (NPA) are unelected and unaccountable, staying in post for up to 10 years. The general public would not accept their local authority councillors to serve that length of time without the need for re-elections – so why should NP residents be treated as second-class citizens? The ONE VOICE current online survey shows that 86% of NP residents want to see direct elections of authority members. There is currently no statutory mechanism in place that could redress this democratic deficit. For this reason we would support the Public Bodies Bill as it will create a mechanism to change the constitution of National Park Authorities and bring them in line with other local authorities.
    The New Forest has the second largest area of FC land, totalling 27,613 hectares and we all have a stake in its future. Those calling for the Public Bodies Bill to be scrapped before it reaches Royal Ascent are acting because they are passionate about retaining public access to woodlands and forests, and that is a good thing. We only ask that you reconsider the need to scrap the Bill ‘wholesale’ and consider the implications for the folk who need legislation to improve local democracy. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
    Sue Baillie, ONE VOICE, New Forest http://tinyurl.com/64rgzfq

    By OneVoiceHants at 22:39 on 24/01/11

      Report
              
     
max 4000 characters
        
   

Related Businesses

       
   

Latest Stories in Camberley

       
      

Local Jobs

       
   

Search for...

       
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min rent is bigger than Max rent